Juan
Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2006
- Messages
- 128
- Best answers
- 0
Calls to invade Mexico are a pretext.
Firstly, the use of force as a way to clamp down on drug cartels is the pretext that is expected to be used by the U.S for invading Mexico and installing a pro American Business Government, A pretext allows the attacker to bypass international law. International law prohibits military intervention unless it is in self-defense or authorized by the UN Security Council. However, under the guise of a humanitarian mission, a country can claim that they are rescuing a suffering population from their oppressive government. Such reasoning provides a veneer of legitimacy for what is essentially an illegal act.
One of the most well-known examples of this FALSE PRETEXT phenomenon is the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which was carried out under the pretext of removing WMD's from Iraq and also freeing the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein's dictatorship. The real purpose of the invasion was to gain access to Iraq's oil. The invasion led to the deaths of Hundreds of thousands of people and plunged the country into a protracted civil war.
Mexico has been a steadfast ally of the United States for many years, with close economic and cultural ties between the two countries. However, this relationship seems to be facing new challenges in recent years. Particularly concerning is the rising hostility towards Mexico from the Republican Party. Calls for military action against Mexico in the context of the war on drugs have become more common among GOP presidential candidates, with some even openly advocating for a naval blockade or bombing Mexico itself. In this blog post, we will explore this disturbing trend and what it could mean for the future of Mexico-America relations.
The issue of drug trafficking is a complex one, and no one denies the devastating consequences it has for both Mexico and the United States. However, military action is not the answer. Not only would it constitute a flagrant violation of international law, but it would also worsen the already strained relations between the two countries. The Mexican government has already expressed its strong opposition to any unauthorized military intervention, and such actions would be met with resistance from Mexican citizens.
Furthermore, the idea that military action could solve the problem of drug trafficking is misguided. The root causes of this issue are multifaceted, including poverty, inequality, past corruption, and the demand for drugs in the United States. Addressing these underlying issues requires a comprehensive approach that involves strategies for development, economic cooperation, and alternative solutions to drug addiction.
Another worrying aspect of the Republican Party's stance on Mexico is the demonization of immigrants. Xenophobic rhetoric has been on the rise, with some candidates using inflammatory language to describe Mexicans as rapists and criminals. Not only is this language deeply offensive, but it also perpetuates harmful stereotypes and contributes to a climate of fear and hostility.
In addition, invading Mexico is also a matter of international law and diplomacy. It is simply not acceptable to invade a sovereign country without the approval of the United Nations, and doing so would be a clear violation of international law. Such a move can lead to negative consequences for the US on the world stage. It can even result in economic sanctions, boycotts by other countries.
Firstly, the use of force as a way to clamp down on drug cartels is the pretext that is expected to be used by the U.S for invading Mexico and installing a pro American Business Government, A pretext allows the attacker to bypass international law. International law prohibits military intervention unless it is in self-defense or authorized by the UN Security Council. However, under the guise of a humanitarian mission, a country can claim that they are rescuing a suffering population from their oppressive government. Such reasoning provides a veneer of legitimacy for what is essentially an illegal act.
One of the most well-known examples of this FALSE PRETEXT phenomenon is the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which was carried out under the pretext of removing WMD's from Iraq and also freeing the Iraqi people from Saddam Hussein's dictatorship. The real purpose of the invasion was to gain access to Iraq's oil. The invasion led to the deaths of Hundreds of thousands of people and plunged the country into a protracted civil war.
Mexico has been a steadfast ally of the United States for many years, with close economic and cultural ties between the two countries. However, this relationship seems to be facing new challenges in recent years. Particularly concerning is the rising hostility towards Mexico from the Republican Party. Calls for military action against Mexico in the context of the war on drugs have become more common among GOP presidential candidates, with some even openly advocating for a naval blockade or bombing Mexico itself. In this blog post, we will explore this disturbing trend and what it could mean for the future of Mexico-America relations.
The issue of drug trafficking is a complex one, and no one denies the devastating consequences it has for both Mexico and the United States. However, military action is not the answer. Not only would it constitute a flagrant violation of international law, but it would also worsen the already strained relations between the two countries. The Mexican government has already expressed its strong opposition to any unauthorized military intervention, and such actions would be met with resistance from Mexican citizens.
Furthermore, the idea that military action could solve the problem of drug trafficking is misguided. The root causes of this issue are multifaceted, including poverty, inequality, past corruption, and the demand for drugs in the United States. Addressing these underlying issues requires a comprehensive approach that involves strategies for development, economic cooperation, and alternative solutions to drug addiction.
Another worrying aspect of the Republican Party's stance on Mexico is the demonization of immigrants. Xenophobic rhetoric has been on the rise, with some candidates using inflammatory language to describe Mexicans as rapists and criminals. Not only is this language deeply offensive, but it also perpetuates harmful stereotypes and contributes to a climate of fear and hostility.
In addition, invading Mexico is also a matter of international law and diplomacy. It is simply not acceptable to invade a sovereign country without the approval of the United Nations, and doing so would be a clear violation of international law. Such a move can lead to negative consequences for the US on the world stage. It can even result in economic sanctions, boycotts by other countries.
Last edited:
