• Create Account

    In less than 1 min, By registering, you'll be able to discuss, chat, share and private message with other members of our community. All 100% free

    SignUp Now!

Russian President: Obama a 'thinker... unlike other people'

funny_pie_chart.jpg
 
Heres a quick link I found in like a minute that explains a little more about where that money gos .


http://www.warresisters.org/pages/piechart.htm


I am here to help .

so make the argument like he did don't squirm like a worm on a hook. do the math. deduct the numbers laid out the initial numbers posted in those charts. Then do the same for the russians and prove him wrong. don't start guessing like troof and profiding weak links. show what in that link is relevant to your argument. you do the work and lay it out don't be a lazy a** now you're almost there. you said it's there get the numbers on the russian side like the chart and american like the chart do the deductions and show how after the miscellany would make the difference guy. what are you waiting for? you act like you're scared of steve doocey. troof called him a geek and you called him stupid it should be no problem for you.

why are you like putting up a link and tyhen saying "this will help?" say what in it specifically helps how and lay out the numbers including the deductions. you can do it guy. b waitin

thanks so much. (lol)
 
Hey steve doofy>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Not for sure how you came up with that post or why . But I never said it was a perfect system,I said that the military budget accounts for more than tanks,planes ect...

after looking that over you provided a link displaying a lack of adequate care in russia in some instances in terms of medical services he showed the same here and as such nullified your argument. he has put up solid figures. you still aren't backing up your argument and troof is crying in a corner trying to use his bullet proof vest against a geek like steve doocy.

put up numbers to make this clear guy.

i'd support you if you could do it. go ahead.

thanks guy
 
What math would you like me to do for you? Are you talking about adding up THE GIANT LIST of broken promises by Bush, Bush, Clinton etc? Well once you post them I'll add them up for you.

abacus.jpg
 
no i believe what doocy is leading you around by nose by is the advantageous position the us is in vs. russians with less nukes in a one on one war. our capabilities are stronger, longer and deeper. this is evidenced and caused by the level of investment we do put and have into our military vs them and what their resources economically limit them to. your argument was they are better off yet you could do nothing but talk and post childish pictures and even the talk was questions, short sentences and "bbbbbb... but what about bullet proof vests?" without even laying out how their capabilities regarding bullet proof vests give them a decided advantage in every way on the battle field over us. never eve showed how well outfitted with bullet proof vests they are compared with us or what they wear on average vs us.

the math would be regarding the $711 billion we spend vs the $70 billion they spend on the military and how after deducting all on combat related spending we would be even vs all their non combat deductions from their $70 billion. you're up, the light's on you and the bleachers are full all eyes on you right now. what will you do drop it or swoosh?

thanks guy.
 
Lets start out with... where did I or anybody else say the Russians are better off than the US: militarily speaking?
You are so mental- lol.
 
so make the argument like he did don't squirm like a worm on a hook. do the math. deduct the numbers laid out the initial numbers posted in those charts. Then do the same for the russians and prove him wrong. don't start guessing like troof and profiding weak links. show what in that link is relevant to your argument. you do the work and lay it out don't be a lazy a** now you're almost there. you said it's there get the numbers on the russian side like the chart and american like the chart do the deductions and show how after the miscellany would make the difference guy. what are you waiting for? you act like you're scared of steve doocey. troof called him a geek and you called him stupid it should be no problem for you.

why are you like putting up a link and tyhen saying "this will help?" say what in it specifically helps how and lay out the numbers including the deductions. you can do it guy. b waitin

thanks so much. (lol)



You can lead a horse to water,but you can't make them drink .
 
after looking that over you provided a link displaying a lack of adequate care in russia in some instances in terms of medical services he showed the same here and as such nullified your argument. he has put up solid figures. you still aren't backing up your argument and troof is crying in a corner trying to use his bullet proof vest against a geek like steve doocy.

put up numbers to make this clear guy.

i'd support you if you could do it. go ahead.

thanks guy



Your making Mexicans look dumber every time to post man .. Do the math what fucking math ? It a point I made ! Jeez man !
 
no i believe what doocy is leading you around by nose by is the advantageous position the us is in vs. russians with less nukes in a one on one war. our capabilities are stronger, longer and deeper. this is evidenced and caused by the level of investment we do put and have into our military vs them and what their resources economically limit them to. your argument was they are better off yet you could do nothing but talk and post childish pictures and even the talk was questions, short sentences and "bbbbbb... but what about bullet proof vests?" without even laying out how their capabilities regarding bullet proof vests give them a decided advantage in every way on the battle field over us. never eve showed how well outfitted with bullet proof vests they are compared with us or what they wear on average vs us.

the math would be regarding the $711 billion we spend vs the $70 billion they spend on the military and how after deducting all on combat related spending we would be even vs all their non combat deductions from their $70 billion. you're up, the light's on you and the bleachers are full all eyes on you right now. what will you do drop it or swoosh?

thanks guy.



OK..I know I'm wasting time by doing this for you and since your to stupid or lazy to look it up . I have a first hand account of the "VEST" debate here . I had one in Nam,heavy and hot best 2 words to describe them . The way they are made is very simple ,a plate of steel in the front and one in the back . And a canvas material out side of it holding it to getter . Very easy made and cost is pretty cheap to . Today vest are a totally different thing . There made out of light weight materials like Kevlar and graghite resins es. Much lighter and cooler than the old ones . Price I would imagine its more expensive to make as it is much stronger than the old ones were .
 
okay, but i believe you are really missing the mark guy. i think the point is you need to first demonstrate exactly the vests we use currently and exactly the kind the russians use. troof essentially said despite the fact we spend $711 billion on our military and they spend $70 billion if we remove nukes we need to look at before anything else vests. so you need to show how in a war between us and the russian federation one on one sans nukes how vests would be the deciding factor as to who wins given all the other variables. it's a ridiculous argument dude you should back out and just let him keep digging his own grave.

try the math.

(lol)

thanks and b waitin...
 
Lets start out with... where did I or anybody else say the Russians are better off than the US: militarily speaking?
You are so mental- lol.

good boy you just made my point. we would win. we are in a better position the fewer nukes there are between us and the russians b/c we would yam their asses son.

(lol)

done.

thanks again...
 
b/c we would yam their asses son.

"Yam an ass?" Don't ask, don't tell! I'm not asking so don't tell me about your queer desires.

And then you drop a "we" what the fuck is this "we" sh!t?

"Killing" soldiers in a video game does not count.
 
Nice and thanks some good reading there and will give it to my buddies . I have another link I can post (find it again ) to watch the contracts the government pays for .

OK, yes the break down of the numbers is interesting.
 
"Yam an ass?" Don't ask, don't tell! I'm not asking so don't tell me about your queer desires.

And then you drop a "we" what the fuck is this "we" sh!t?

"Killing" soldiers in a video game does not count.

yam? it's like all those debates where suddenly you change the subject or try to distract etc because you're getting beat. that's getting yammed. you have a right to make whatever associations come into your head as just the natural first relations you make when you think of things. you don't have to try to keep asking if i'm gay. it's never gonna happen but be you son, try hero of you two haven't already.

we stands for americans. when a war is won we win. the military is not by themselves and civilians are not the fan club. go to school. learn your history.

you ain't out there defending the country in any way shape or form, so what are you talking about? military? you? you think bulletproof vests would be the deciding factor in a one on one war sans nukes between the us and russia. oh yeah not to mention you don't even know where afghanistan is located!
roflmao.gif
roflmao.gif
roflmao.gif


he was right obama's smarter. we are in a better position. less nukes in a stockpile between the two countries that could destroy the globe many times over really doesn't make a difference anyway.

sorry, but thanks son.
 
Registrarse / Join The Forum

Mexican Forums

Ad

Back
Top