other group one has to believe that one group is stronger and smarter then the other.
The only way Group A can take advanatge of group B is if Group B is weaker then Group A...
lol!!! so when that group over throws the opressors then what? so when those african countries sent the colonists packing then what? does that mean they were smarter and stronger all of a sudden? you talked about white farmers in zimbabwe being oppressed
They were out numbered and they removed the Apartheid Policy in may places in Africa which helped the whites protect themselves from the savage Feral Negros. Not to the whites lost support from their home governments which turned Liberal and helped Africa beat the whites.
what are you talking about? colonialism and apartheid are 2 separate methods of government control of a populace.
if you had studied this you would know this. the only place that utilized apartheid was not overthrown by force. but by africans using their brains and reaching out to the rest of the world. they wrote and gave speeches. if they were so stupid how could they have accomplished this? (still waiting...) how is it bishop desmond tutu has a better grasp of the english language than you for instance if he is supposed to b e dumber? same goes for mandela. how did his words affect so many? liberals? that is not a genetic disposition. try and actually not make something up this time.
you are talking south africa. the rest mostly won independence through a combination of force and diplomacy both. sure they lost support in some places, but not everywhere. what about the places they were overthrown with military force and strategy? how is that possible if they were in possession of smaller brains as you contend? how is that possible? explain using historical references please and not make things up. when you are actually making up words dude... that's when you know you're losing...
by the dictatorship. so you're saying the black dictatorship is stronger and smarter? but they're black and you said blacks are dumber.
Both sides lost dude. Negros in Africa are starving. There isn't a day in Africa where a large percentage of the population isn't infected with aids or malaria or a day where there isn't a freakin genocide lol.
not all countries are doing poorly budguy. i'm sorry, but thought they have high starvation rated and poverty rates those are a result of many things. much of which have to do with their history and the difficult time they have had piecing together solid governments out of the remnants of colonialism essentially on their own. those places weren't nations previously like say india or thailand. the nations in existence at the time had entirely different borders. you still have not responded to that at all all of which i wrote about and all the quotes and citations. you have yet to source your arguments. latin america is also different. how? because in latin america the whites mostly stayed and stayed in power, in command of the wealth and politics. thus iut was much easier to have relationships with western countries. look at the facts. they had extermination campaigns of natives as well. it's all in the history books. you wouldn't need to make things up if you just read, stop lying. it makes you appear... immature.
Africa is a shit hole. There's your proof right there.
that proves nothing. what about appalicia. the region you referred to. over 60% illiteracy in the central region. what is their black population? how do you explain that? how do you explain regions of america that went broke? they weren't run by black people. how do you explain it? the rust belt. some places are horrible. not africa. how do you explain that? go ahead. and try not making things up this time. fantasy worlds are so... three year old...
see the fallacy of your logic? it falls apart quickly. very quickly. it's feeble and brittle as are moonbat racist paranoid insecure theories. it's based on sweeping generalizations that in the real world of governments, nations, wars and international relations not to mention race relations is vastly more complex than that.
Nope, my argument never fell apart. Whites in Africa lost support and were outnumbered. Ten thousand of them have been murdered By Negros since they got rid of Apartheid. And the countries turned into shitholes.
really? sorry, but there were countries that had their government's support and lost. that if historical fact. you aid they were all spear chuckers. so how did they win? spears against guns and bombs? sorry guy not working. falling apart quickly. how about south africa? you know the place there was apartheid? they won by reaching out tho the international community. the whites were thoroughly outnumbered but war did nothing. in fact the war they had the whites who were vastly outnumbered won. then blacks won their independence through the pen.
mandela, tutu, biko and others. how is that possible if they were feral savages? they wouldn't have the brain capacity. how is mandela smarter than you. how is tutu smarter than you? shall we paste copies of what they have written and compare it with what you have written? how did that happen? you are not taking into account the whole history why. you haven't read. you are gleaming bits and pieces from kkk websites that are obviously biased. you have not read un-biased left nor right history on the continent. you are making things up again. read guy. try it for once... (lol)
Again you're not qualified to talk about negros since you're a nigger lover and not a niggerologist like I am. Sorry.
come on budguy. that's baby talk. now you're living in three year old fantasy land again. you going to show us your diploma from college in that field? i suppose that won't be made up either. thanks for proving me right. i knew you were a faker.
remember, even in latin america european descendants still dominated much of the countries they left behind by remaining the ruling group of peoples and such. however in africa that is not the case. most countries ended up with ruling black governments. you say blacks are the dumbest people and weakest. so how is that possible. that shoots both your theories to dust. you are just kinda making things up as you go and it's getting worse and worse for you. why don't you try reading some actual african history.
A lot good their ruling black government has done to them lol. Latin America is Mixed. Some countries are like 95% white and others are like 90% Indio dark skins. The Indio Dark Skin countries are usually poorer but thats because of their anti materialist philosophy which I don't you
even understand. Thats my belief ofcourse. There is nothign wrong with not being a materialist but they better not bitch for free welfare if they're that way.
there's nothing wrong with a belief. but i am bringing facts to the table. i am talking fact. you are talking "my belief" as you say. you believe you are an expert on africa because of a made up fantasy when you are losing arguments. you believe you are a marine when you are losing arguments. you believe you know why countries are poor based on a belief you believe they adhere to yet cannot provide links to as the reason their entire nation is poor relative to dark skin. my bet is you can't. why? you are a faker. you are phony. you live in a fantasy land and when things don;t go budguy's way you start retreating into that hole you have made up where you are an expert in a non existent philosophy, a marine when you dress up and in school when you need to feel better about yourself. you lie. and you even make it obvious.
what about india? they used predominantly nonviolence. that is physically weaker. how did they do it? your theory is simply too simplistic guy. read more and stop making things up. lol.
What about them? Don't worry, I know about the story of Gandi and he's non violent ways. Thats something to admire. Anyways To begin with whites were out matched 10000000000 to 1. And as far as I know they are doing well ever since they started practicing capitalism. I love India and hindus and I dont get mad if they steal American jobs. Good for them! They are humans in my eyes.
do you know how long it took them to start doing well? they were starving for years as many other asian and latin american nations still are. how is that? why is that? why is bangladesh still starving? same with shri lanka?
your theories are falling apart guy. whites were outmatched in india? they were outmatched in south africa s well. but there was never a fight for independence there. the initial conquering was a war and they were outmatched then too. remember india and south africa won their independence through their non violent efforts not through their failed violent efforts. they used their minds. strategy, literature, philosophy and diplomacy. the pen was mightier than the sword and that can only be accomplished if the people employing the weapon of the pen are smart. they have to be educated. if they are all dumb how is that possible? (still waiting...) your philosophy is breaking and you are starting to lie badly and all over the place. sorry...
no they drew out the lines they decided to claim as their own according to the designs they had on that country. the thoughts about the native population was secondary and came afterwords. if you read a little on the continent you'd know that it's pretty basic stuff guy. i never said that. and remember. once the blacks got guns they took their countries back in many cases.
Well now they(whites) left and are not in power anymore. WHats the Excuse of the Fuckign Negro now? Ohh thats right, we're suppose to feed, educate and provide for them until they get back on their feet.... Guess what. That will never happen no matter how much we teach them! LOL
sure it will. the countries that won through non violent strategies employs their minds. sorry guy. that's the fact. they need to work out the civil wars. they have only been independent and trying to live with these tribal conflicts amongst groups with deep and long hatreds of each other for a matter of decades. some are stabilizing and others are not. unfortunately those that are stabilizing have limited resources with which to become rich. so they are starting from scratch.
those who are warring mostly are those with resources. they still need to stop. of course that's difficult when outside corporations start funding rebels as soon as those governments get ready to take control of their resources. thus instability results. the same way in many latin american countries companies like monsanto do the same thing. huge logging concerns do the same thing. you are losing. your philosophy is becoming dust... keep trying... you are now linking interests you are attempting to separate. (lol)
where did i say that? you are making stuff up and fantasizing again as usual. dude come out of your fantasy world you wish existed and get wit reality. i didn't say that, that's just what you wish i said. you aren't even looking at the words i write, just making it up as you go. try again. re-read what i said.
Every time you say Blacks need better jobs, better education more opportunity you are implying that they are dependent on white people to give them these things. Same thing if you say that about browns.
no i'm not and where did i say that? i'm saying they need stability in their own countries. they educated themselves in many african countries with higher literacy rates than some european cpountries and far higher that the appalaccias. how is that possible? they can do it themselves. in fact the thing western companies fear most is just that. what would debeers and mobil do if countries they had concerns in stabilized? you say that will never happen, but you don't realize it's getting closer and closer all the time. india has done it. others will as well.
as far as this country they need the opportunity to get jobs free from prejudice like all minorities and women. not just black people. the same way they have the equal right to carry a gun in the military due to the fact they are just as civilized and gun responsible as anyone of any other race.
what hero? who are you talking about? where did i say i had a hero? what are you even talking about dude? you are making things up again and you know it and you believe i'm winning this argument as you're getting more emotional and more angry wit each post son. you're getting housed 'cause as usual you don't know what you are talking about and instead of admitting it you are fantasizing and making thing up m ore and more as you go. hung high? the only thing hanging ids your theory with all those loose ends and the rest that's just being hung out ti dry. get a grip and stop living in an insecure fantasy world regarding what's happening, history and what i'm saying.
I was talkign about that Negro who comes out
(15 hours a week of school huh?)in the book "Things fall apart".
which person from the book are speaking of specifically? which character? are you speaking of the author? who and what are you speaking of? where did i say anything about anyone related to that book being a hero or mine? you are fantasizing because you wish i said that. the same way you are fantasizing that blacks are genetically predisposed to incivility.
thanks budguy. you made that debate easy.
